CBDCs are digital forms of national currencies, which are issued and controlled by a nation's central bank. As most cryptocurrencies are decentralized, CBDCs are centralized and supported by government authorities. In that respect, the rise of CBDCs may have a big toll on changes in crypto space pertaining to adoption, regulation, and innovation.
One big implication is the greater regulatory scrutiny. It follows that governments may see CBDCs as a way to maintain control over monetary policy in the digital era and therefore apply strict regulations to decentralized cryptocurrencies. For example, stablecoins pegged to traditional currencies could face growing competition or even regulatory curbs, since CBDCs offer a similar stable digital alternative directly backed by central banks.
CBDCs could also further crypto adoption by getting the public comfortable with digital assets, which would lower the barriers to entry for decentralized cryptocurrencies. In building out infrastructure and consumer familiarity with digital currency wallets, transfers, and payments, CBDCs may mean a more crypto-literate population-indirectly contributing to the broader diffusion of cryptocurrencies.
But the fact that CBDCs are centralized raises red flags with regard to financial privacy. While in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, transactions can be pseudonymous, CBDCs might give full visibility to governments on individual spending, hence potentially constraining privacy in digital transactions.
In a nutshell, though CBDCs are bound to unleash some level of competition against several crypto assets, they also avails opportunities for crypto adoption and development, hence shaping the future of digital finance.
Thanks
~ Nesaty